[centerNet]PROJECT SLAM at centerNet’s 2014 AGM

[centerNet网站消息]

Introducing DHCommons PROJECT SLAM
Interested in having your project peer-reviewed in the inaugural issue of the DHCommons journal? Get started on crafting a project statement at the centerNet/ADHO lunchtime meeting at DH 2014! DHCommons will be hosting a PROJECT SLAM, where each project representative will have 90 seconds to briefly introduce the project, and speak about the contribution, presentation, and/or preservation aspects of the project, as guided by the topics in the DHCommons journal review guidelines: http://dhcommons.org/journal#guidelines.
DHCommons editors will also present some tips and suggestions for crafting a compelling project statement. Project statements are due August 15, 2014 for consideration for the first issue of the DHCommons journal; see http://dhcommons.org/journal#submission for details.
“Contribution” questions include

How does the project advance contemporary discussions within its particular subject area?Does the project fully engage with current scholarship in the field?Do the digital methods employed offer unique insights into the project’s key questions?

“Presentation” questions include:

Does the interface effectively communicate and facilitate the goals, purpose, and argument of the project?How do the design and content elements of the project interact and integrate with one another?Discuss usability of the interface(s) from the perspective of a reader/researcher; if possible, also discuss usability from the perspective of current user experience best practices.

“Preservation” questions include:

Have relevant best practices and standards been followed for markup and metadata?Is documentation available about the project? Is information provided about who, why and when and how different responsibilities were assigned?How is the project hosted? Through a university server? A commercial host? A non-profit organization? Is there evidence of ongoing commitment to support of the project at the level of hosting? Is there similar evidence of ongoing support from project personnel?Is there a preservation and maintenance plan for the interface, software, and associated databases (multiple copies, mirror sites, collaboration with data archives, etc.)? Is the project fully exportable/transferable?Is the software being used proprietary, open-source, or editable by multiple programs? Are there clear plans for future accessibility? Will researchers have access to project material and/or metadata outside of a web-based interface? Is there a sustainability plan, if appropriate?